Oslo Terrorist anti-Oil, pro-Environment Extremist?
Getting around is necessary, oil is not. Considerable efforts should be made to further develop high-power Lithium-Ion batteries. The goal should be to aim for oil independence. This will not only save the environment; it will completely devastate many Muslim countries economically which will weaken the ongoing Islamic imperialism. (pg. 1199)
So should we drag out the pitchforks and light the torches and go after Al Gore for his crazed environmental rhetoric that obviously inspired this monster?
What we should do is recognize that anyone who slaughters children mercilessly the way Anders did is a psychotic madman.
—— UPDATE ——-
How about this one?
All 2nd and 3rd world countries (where the average birth rate is above 2,1) are to implement 1 child policies until their country is stabilised in regards to financial outlooks and overconsumption, saving their forests etc. This will both solve their poverty problem and result in drastic cuts in global pollution due to the fact that the population (consumer) explosion will be reversed. You cannot have any hope of reducing global pollution unless you focus on reducing the current population explosion in 2nd and 3rd world countries. Any country that does not comply will not receive any incentives (aid, development funding/loans, and trade import/export concessions). This approach can also be used for giving these countries incentives to stop them from cutting down their forests.
This terrorist advocates using restrictions on births, and other population control methods in order to curtail global pollution – will they call him an environmental extremist? No.
—- OSLO POSTS —–