NYT Reporter Had ‘Touching’ Sympathy for Charlie Hebdo Victims, NOT For Texas Garland Targets
Yeah it’s just as I suspected – the mainstream media were besides themselves with happiness when they could defend the French under attack by Muslims because the Charlie Hebdo people were anti-religion, all religion. But to defend the free speech of Christians in Texas is their worst nightmare.
Here’s a great example:
But here’s what she said about a Charlie Hebdo victim:
I didn’t see the kind of doubt she displayed at Garland pointed at Hebdo. Though, to be fair, she did defend Muslim outrage at Hebdo here.
Yeah you won’t be seeing #JeSuisGarland trending tomorrow because the media elites are too good for those right wing nutjobs in Texas.
Wow she’s really intent on digging her hole deeper:
Yes, Christians objected to being insulted in Charlie Hebdo. We didn’t pick up a gun and murder cartoonists. It’s just insanely bizarre that Rukmini thinks these is any moral equivalency.