Come Laugh At Liberals Freaking Out Over Slate’s ‘Homophobic’ Article On Hillary!!!
These are my favorite articles – when liberals freak out over what one of their own does. This time, it’s a Slate article that’s making them micturate in their skinny jeans:
Hillary Clinton isn’t a lesbian—but she dresses like one: https://t.co/2q1cB64aG5 pic.twitter.com/WSFc78DX49
— Slate (@Slate) January 15, 2016
Here’s the reaction:
Take this down and apologize. https://t.co/qqvJqzZfX0
— Alexander Chee (@alexanderchee) January 15, 2016
This is Nancy Pelosi’s daughter:
.@slate isn’t a homophobe – but it trolls like one. #SavedYouAClick https://t.co/OMtMYOhA9Q — sfpelosi (@sfpelosi) January 15, 2016
hey hi i’m the chief of the fuck you police force and you’re under arrest https://t.co/IC4DJ59vL4
— Laura June (@laura_june) January 15, 2016
Keep in mind, this author's Twitter bio says "professional troll", so at least she's on-brand. Well done, @Slate! https://t.co/4HAtLHEY0l
— Steven Peterson (@squeakytoy) January 15, 2016
I can't with this. not enough coffee in the world. https://t.co/5XcFL6zNex
— jay, millennial (@jaythenerdkid) January 15, 2016
A woman wearing pantsuits means she’s “dressing like a lesbian”? Thats not even a thing. Delete this homophobic mess https://t.co/34asN5l6Bt — Izanagi. (@johnnyShady_) January 15, 2016
Wait.. does that mean Hillary is a lesbian?! How is it homophobic if she’s not?!
when @slate writers try to be clever pic.twitter.com/nSPkEhcGIE
— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) January 15, 2016
@PatrickStrud wow, bad day for @Slate journalism. Poor editing choices, ridiculous and offensive #homophobic #sexist
— Sarah Hughes ✌️ (@donteducateblog) January 15, 2016
@Slate whoever posted this needs to be FIRED ASAP. This is deplorable, sexist and homophobic bullshit!
— Kim Frederick (@kimfrederi) January 15, 2016
FIRE THEM AND BURN THEM AT THE STAKE FOR WORDS THAT MADE ME CRY!!
Are you fucking serious @Slate? If you're gonna go after female politicians REGARDLESS of their affiliation, don't be sexist or homophobic.
— Stephanie Evans (@StephEvz43) January 15, 2016
Pretty sure they intended to write “c’mon.” Maybe spelling is homophobic too:
@Slate common man, that’s homophobic to imply lesbians have a certain style of dress — Timmy Bermuda (@TimmyBermuda) January 15, 2016
How do you “dress like a lesbian?” You don’t and can’t. https://t.co/nONnPgE5Ve
— PantheR (@____PantheR) January 15, 2016
yeah, wtf @Slate ?? What does a #lesbian dress like? https://t.co/WB5ZNdTs21
— Kelly Cogswell (@kellyatlarge) January 15, 2016
LOL!! Right… we’re just gonna brain bleach any stereotypes that we ALL have about how lesbians dress. Sure. Oh wait, I think we have someone who can clarify….
Sensible shoes. Flannel. Pantsuits. Mullet hair. Doc Martins. Ad naseam. Us queer women have heard ALL the innuendo, @Slate. #HOMOPHOBIC
— Amy Hanna (@ctownchick1) January 15, 2016
Yup, that’s it! LOL!
Wtf? What homophobic shit is this, @Slate ? https://t.co/a9FtrPSPt8 — Chris Stevenson (@chris_stevenson) January 15, 2016
Hey Slate! Actual lesbian here. Thanks for the compliment. Oh, was that supposed to be insulting? LOL, ya genderpolicing, homophobic fools
— Suzi Steffen (@SuziSteffen) January 15, 2016
“Gender policing” is probably as bad as the holocaust, when you think about it.
.@Slate the article’s good & rips into the title. But WHY. Clickbait to educate homophobic trolls? Because you offended the rest of us.
— Enber ChaosDancer (@EnberFox) January 15, 2016
Ahhhh. Sooo goood. Thank you for your hilarious PC outrage, liberals. I needed a good laugh today….
