chick-fil-a banned

Micro-Aggression Alert! Christians Have to Bake Gay Cakes, But John Hopkins Students Can’t Even SEE Chick-Fil-A

Migro-Aggression alert! Also, TRIGGER WARNING! Extreme stupidity ahead!

This is just a pathetic joke. Apparently the idiots at John Hopkins University believe their students are so dainty and sensitive that the very sight of food from Chick-Fil-A will make them faint into a pile of triggered idiocy.

From the Pundit Press:

Johns Hopkins University has banned Chick-fil-A from its campus saying that the restaurant is a “microaggression” against its students.

In an 18-8 vote, the Student Government Association at Johns Hopkins voted not to “support the proposal of a Chick-fil-A, in a current or future sense, particularly on any location that is central to student life.”

The anti-Chick-fil-A bill listed seven main reasons why the restaurant should be banned from campus. The first is that “the Student Government Association of Johns Hopkins University aims to provide a safe, supportive environment for all university affiliates now and in the future.”

The fourth is that “visiting prospective and current students, staff, faculty, and other visitors who are members of the LGBTQ+ community or are allies would be subjected to the microaggression of supporting current or future Chick-fil-A development plans.”

For those who don’t know, a micro-aggression is a veiled racism or bigotry that the victim is sensitive to but the aggressor is often blind to because of their “privileged status,” which basically means tiny stupid details that most people don’t notice. You have to have borrowed $100k of taxpayer money and spent it on a gender studies PhD. in order to identify most “micro-aggressions.”

SO let me get this straight – forcing a Christian to bake a cake for a gay wedding against his religious principles is OK, but LGBT students can’t even have Chick-Fil-A food come within their eyesight because the owner is for traditional marriage? Just unbelievable.

Twitter Says Tom Brady Is An Unpatriotic Tea Party Racist for Snubbing Obama
  • xrlq

    Refusing to sell cakes to gays is a bad idea. Banning a specific chain from selling food on your campus is a bad idea. Neither has anything to do with the other. At all.

  • Delaney Coffer

    There was no cake to refuse to sell, you half wit. It hadn’t been made. I’d love to hear you assclowns defend forcing people to participate in a parade that celebrates incest.

  • xrlq

    There was a catalog of cakes they attempted to order from, you quarter-wit. They were refused the sale solely because *they* were gay, not because there was anything odd or unusual about the cake, you one-eighth wit. No one tried to force them to participate in any parade, you 1/16-wit. Nor does Colorado (or any other state I’m aware of) have a law prohibiting discrimination against incest, you 1/32-wit. But thank you for playing.

  • Delaney Coffer

    A catalog of their art that you think they should be forced at gunpoint to produce for something they don’t wish to be associated with. You are a totalitarian scumbag. You also have the intellect of an insect.

  • xrlq

    I never said anything about forcing anyone to do anything, you illiterate moron. I don’t care what or if you think, but would appreciate you not telling me what I supposedly think. Focus on the simple stuff you can handle, like maybe tying your own shoes every morning. Once you can do that without assistance for a month or two, maybe you can graduate to some higher order tasks like reading news items, forming at least semi-informed opinions about them and maybe even expressing what *you* think. But you will never competent to say what anyone else thinks. Stop trying.

  • Delaney Coffer

    “I never said anything about forcing anyone to do anything” It was the very first thing you wrote, you insane asshole. Where do you freaks come from? What you wrote is still there, you pathetic dumbass.

  • el_polacko

    forget all of this ‘micro-agression’ nonsense. the real question is why ANY private businesses should be located on campus.

  • el_polacko

    your personal insults are not helpful but there’s no doubt that all of this yammerring these last few months about bakers ‘forced’ to bake cakes, florists ‘forced’ to sell flowers, and pizza parlors ‘forced’ to serve pizza has been ridiculous and an embarrassment.

  • Pingback: Persecuted Christian-owned bakery raises $109,000… until gay advocates SHUT DOWN ‘GoFundMe’ page()

  • xrlq

    So telling you your idea is bad equals pointing a gun at you. O-kay.

  • Delaney Coffer

    Why was it a bad idea, Einstein?

  • Delaney Coffer

    Or any private person, for that matter.

  • Delaney Coffer

    Is refusing to create product for a celebration of incest a “bad idea”, super smart honest person?

  • Pingback: Unbelievable! Baltimore Mayor Admits She Ordered Police to Give ‘Space For Those Who Wished to DESTROY’()

  • davecross

    So if a student wants a chicken sandwich for an evening study session, he/she should be forced to get it from the campus cafeteria? Wouldn’t that be disgusting.

  • Steve Brown

    I have tried to find the link but it was in regard to something which happened about 5 years ago and I can no longer find it. The incident happened in England.
    Two persons of the same sex began kissing and groping in a bar. The barman and the manager evicted them on the grounds of inappropriate behaviour. The two persons tried to sue the establishement from which they had been evicted.
    In their defence, the barman and the manager produced CCTV footage to back up their assertion that what the two persons were doing was entirely inappropriate in a public bar. The Judge agreed.
    The LGBTQ+(and any other letter considerd appropriate) ‘community’ went into melt-down, demanding special privileges not available to the general public. They demanded that ‘members’ of the LGBTQ+(and any other letter considerd appropriate) ‘community’ be permitted to grope each other’s genitalia as some form of ‘right’. An attempt at an appeal failed.

  • ezra.jones

    Yes. Students run the campus they pay for so they decided homophobic chicken isn’t appropriate. Why u mad

  • Watermelonbeast

    The last I checked Johns Hopkins is a private school and they should be able to contract with any business to provide service on campus. When I lived in Baltimore I used to go to Pollack Johnny’s but of course they have been shut down due to pc nonsense. And OMG the one-eyed guy on the National Boh bottle!!

  • Watermelonbeast

    I think it was also the JHU SGA that would not allow a pro-life group on campus due to micro-aggressive emanations. I think it was George Will the wrote a column about that finally the school changed it’s policy. When I was in Baltimore in the late 1970’s the JHU campus newspaper was widely read throughout the region and JHU was a beacon of free speak and had a great writing program. Oh how times have changed.

  • Patrick James

    Be nice if they said what they meant…I don’t like the politics of the owners so no one should be able to buy their chicken and stopped with their spoiled little rich kid ‘micro-aggressive’ BS.